
What the hell. I mean seriously.
Posing for magazine covers is bad enough sometimes. You usually end up seeing some hack who is way past their prime sitting on a cover doing something wild and crazy as a way to try and suck attention out of the general population (see--> Janet Jackson, Rolling Stone; see--> John Lenon, Vanity Fair). But this whole rash of baby pregnancy covers is getting way the hell out of hand.

I guess Demi Moore started it with her Stupid cover. Am I alone here? Are pregnant women suddenly the new sex symbol for the ages? I mean, I know people are trying to foist the image of "Ultimate Womanhood" and empowerment on us all, but really? I mean. I just really don't need to see pregnant ladies. Honestly. I'm ok.

The thing that is really annoying about all this is that the "public" lauds and praises these women as being bastions of encouragement for women and womynhood and all this other crap. Remember when Brittany had her "celebration pose" for the birth of her first rug rat?

I tried to make it pretty small here cause the pose is.. In a word.... Gross. In two words, hella gross. In seven words, I just threw up in my mouth. In haiku, Brittany grips a head -- As cheeks splayed, chasms open -- can't you smell that smell?
Well, you get the idea. I mean. Think about it. It's a 3d sculpture. You think there is a fig leaf in the back there? I seriously doubt it. I haven't been to the show and so far every article I've seen avoids that... area. I seriously wouldn't be surprised if there was the crowning of a head back there. (***UPDATE*** I found an article on Send2Press... It shows the crowning. IT SHOWS THE FUCKING CROWNING. FULL COoTER VIEW. Yessir. Sexy. There is now way in hell I would go see that show. Call me pedantic, immature, whatever. Not going.)
Anyway, I was talking about how crazy it was that these chicks get gushed on (heh heh heh--Settle down Bevis) for nothing, especially in the case of this sculpture. When it was "unveiled" people were saying how it was such a strong statement for pro-life and all this other garbage. Pro-life? Some ignorant, white trash re-tard has a kid, makes a sculpture of it and that make a bold statement about how other parent should definitely keep their kids? I tell you what. After seeing that, I would be encouraged to get an abortion because (a) childbirth seems totally gross now, and (b) why would I want to bring a child into a world that has life size sculptures of some ignorant pop star giving birth?
I don't see why in the hell she is on the cover of anything except "I deserve Jail Time" magazine. I mean seriously. Child services has been to their house like, what, a dozen times? And she is having ANOTHER child? The magazine she is on is supposed to be about fashion, and high class places to shop, having the right look. You know, bullcrap of the first degree. But Brittany doesn't even have anything to do with any of that. I don't think she would know style if it jumped out and humped her leg for a good hour.
The worst thing is that the vile little succubus is just exploiting her children for press time, BEFORE THEY ARE EVEN BORN! It's not something that we should be praising her for! She wants to be such a good mom? AN example to women everywhere? Then stay out of the media long enough to be one! What the hell man. I tell you what, if I was Sean Austin when I came "of age" I would stab her in the face with a fountain pen. Can you imagine growing up as the kid who's mother has a life size sculpture of you COMING OUT OF HER WOMB?! Seriously. Being a kid is hard enough without your mother being a glory whoring fucktard all of the time... Maybe that's why she keeps dropping him on his head, so when he grows up they'll be on the same I. Q. level...
You want nudity in art, here you are:

There you go. My good friend Marcel, from 1912. That's art people, and yes the human figure can be a graceful and beautiful thing. And many people ask, where do you draw the line, and I am here to tell you that you draw it at giving BIRTH on bearskin rug.